The National Development Policy replaced the Malaysian New Economic Policy in 1990 but continued to pursue most of NEP policies. The Malay share of the economy, though substantially larger, was not near the 30% target according to government figures. In its review of the NEP, the government found that although income inequality had been reduced, some important targets related to overall Malay corporate ownership had not been met. Both Mahathir and the Tunku had expressed concern that the Malays remained too reliant on the Chinese economically.
1.Did you ever heard about this policy?
* YES(50%) * NO(50%)
2.When this policy established?
* 1991(17%) * 1998(0%) * 1987(50%) * 1957(33%)
3.How this policy effect the progress to unite Malaysian citizen?
* By share the same ideology.(14%) * By reduce the economy gap between the races.(57%) * By visitting to oversea together.(29%)
4.What is important of development this policy ?
* To make sure the all people fight each other.(19%) * To proviod the stablity of social and politic.(49%) * To create the new country.(20%) * To make the policy more interesting.(12%)
5.What are the step to make Malaysian to archieve development country?
* By the fighting to be a leader.(8%) * By practice corruption.(23%) * By the create new technology.(38%) * By following the rule.(31%)
CONCLUSION The National Development Policy very important policy for our country.It step to develop a success country and make all races follow the rule to create life in piece.The all Malaysian must know why the government create the policy.
Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia grants the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King of Malaysia) responsibility for “safeguard[ing] the special position of the ‘Malays’ and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak and the legitimate interests of other communities” and goes on to specify ways to do this, such as establishing quotas for entry into the civil service, public scholarships and public education.
Article 153 is one of the most controversial articles in the Malaysian constitution. Critics consider it to create an unnecessary and racialist distinction between Malaysians of different ethnic backgrounds, because it has led to the implementation of affirmative action policies which only benefit the Bumiputra, who comprise a majority of the population. Technically, discussing the repeal of Article 153 is illegal even in Parliament, although it was drafted as a temporary provision to the Constitution. Despite this prohibition on discussion, the article is heatedly debated both privately and publicly among Malaysians. Opposition groups, especially the Democratic Action Party, are often against the implementation of the article although ostensibly maintaining support for it. Nevertheless, the article is viewed as a sensitive matter by many, with politicians who are in favour or oppose it often being labelled as racist.
The article is primarily seen as a continuation of previous laws made by the British to protect the indigenous peoples from being overwhelmed by the immigration of Chinese and Indian workers into Malaya. In the years after independence in 1957, the Chinese and Indians were generally rich urban dwellers, whilst the Bumiputra were mostly poor farmers or manual labourers.
The first clause of the article provides that the government should act "in accordance with the provisions of this Article". The government has successfully done this by implementing certain policies, particularly the New Economic Policy (NEP).
Kiasu (traditional Chinese: 驚輸; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: kiaⁿ-su) is a Hokkien (a Chinese spoken variant) word that literally means 'fear of losing' (Mandarin Chinese: 怕输). However its actual usage would imply a meaning more approaching that of "dog in a manger", and yet not quite (Landon Mossburg). Examples of kiasu behaviour includes accumulating too much food on one's plate during a buffet lunch in case there is no more later, or joining a queue many days in advance just to ensure that one successfully gets hold of the limited free tickets to events, promotions and shows such as Singapore's annual National Day Parade. This word is so widely used by Singaporeans and Malaysians that it is incorporated into their English vocabulary (in the form of Singlish and Manglish). It is often used in describing the social attitudes of people, especially about South East Asian society and its values. Its widespread use is often because these attitudes are common—to not lose out in a highly competitive society (e.g. by above-cited examples), or to the extent of parents imposing heavy study labour on their children in their wish to make them at the very top of all other students. Growing up with this attitude, these students often become ambitious businesspeople, with the desire to be on top in wealth and prestige regardless of whether the most prestigious careers are aligned with their true capabilities. Kiasu has been accepted as an official word in the Oxford English Dictionary. Kiasu is commonly compared to Kiasi (literally, fear of death) and both are commonly used to describe behaviour where Kiasu or Kiasu-ism means to take extreme means to achieve success and Kiasi or Kiasi-ism means to take extreme means to avoid risk. It is often perceived as part of Ah Beng culture. The comic series Mr Kiasu depicts many examples of kiasu behaviour.
Ini mengikut laporan berita dan surat khabar.Adakah kita rasa ia hanya fakta atau khabar angin.Adakah kita bertanggungjawab dalam menjawab persoalan ini?.Ia memang kita bertanggungjawab.Cuba kita fikirkan siapa lagi yang akan memeriahkan sambutan kemerdekaan negara kita kalau bukan kita.Tapi kita terfikirkah apa yang dilakukan oleh kerajaan supaya semangat kemerdekaan sentiasa membara dalam diri setiap peduduknya.Dalam pada masa yang sama ia memasukkan fikiran barat dalam diri setiap penduduknya.(sumber:berita harian 26/8/2010)
Contahnya pembelajaran dalam bahasa inggeris yang sekarang menjadi isu diseluruh malaysia.Cerita dan filem barat yang sentiasa menjadi rebutan di setiap pawagam di negara kita untuk ditayangkan.Orang kata "sambil menyelam minum air".Inilah yang dilakukan oleh orang barat untuk mempengaruhi fikiran kita.Memang betul negara kita tidak lagi dijajah dalam kurungan MERDEKA.Tapi adakah kita terfikir fikiran kita sebenarnya telah dijajah.Cuba kita lihat filem negara kita yang semakin lama semakin kearah kebaratan adakah ini fakta atau hanya kata-kata kosong saja .Tak perlulah saya bercerita panjang lebar nanti banyak pulak silapnya.Setiap kata-kata perlulah difikirkan sebelum menyatakannya.Orang kata"terlajak perahu boleh diundur terlajak kata buruk padahnya"
31 Ogos 1957: Semangat Merdeka ada dalam diri semua pihak dan kanak-kanak ini tidak terkecuali. Dengan rasa bangga dan teruja mereka mengibarkan bendera Malaya, iaitu simbol negara baru yang menuju ke arah pentadbiran sendiri.
3 Julai 1956: Seorang anggota polis mengawal lalu lintas di persimpangan Jalan Pudu, Pasar dan Sungai Besi. 3 Jun 1951: Penyong atau seruling mulut yang dimainkan OM, seorang Lanoh Negrito dari Lenggong, Perak. 12 November 1982: Penari berbakat, pereka tari dan penganjur tarian Melayu tradisional, Azanin Ezane Ahmad sebagai Putri Sa’dong. Drama tari Putri Sa’dong adalah hasil kerjanya yang ketiga selepas Dayang Sari (1978) dan Jentayu (1980). 18 Februari 1958: Kanak-kanak kecil dari Tras, sebelum ini dikenali sebagai pekan hantu di Pahang, berjalan mengucapkan selamat Tahun Baru dan meraikan Tahun Baru Cina dengan bersemangat selepas keadaan kembali pulih di kampung mereka. 30 Disember 1938: Penjual akhbar “Straits Times” di jalanan memberikan perkhidmatan sambil menawarkan senyuman. 2 Mac 1950: Ketika perintah Kecemasan, pergerakan orang ramai dan barangan dipantau untuk mengesan ke akar umbi pihak yang membantu komunis dengan membekalkan makanan serta maklumat kepada pengganas komunis. Gambar menunjukkan konstabel khas memeriksa bakul rotan yang diletakkan di bahagian belakang kereta, yang mana antara sekatan jalan raya dilakukan pada bulan Anti-penjahat berdekatan Kuala Lumpur. 31 Ogos 1957: Tunku Abdul Rahman mengisytiharkan kemerdekaan untuk Malaya di Stadium Merdeka, Kuala Lumpur, selepas membacakan pengisytiharan itu.
17 September 1963: Perdana Menteri, Tunku Abdul Rahman menerima Watikah Perlembagaan Malaysia daripada Yang di-Pertuan Agong pada majlis Pengisytiharan Malaysia di Stadium Merdeka, Kuala Lumpur.
1 September 1957: Bunga api kelihatan pada waktu malam, dihiasi lampu bangunan stesen keretapi ketika Malaya menyambut kemerdekaan daripada pemerintah British. Bunga api itu bernilai AS$20,000, iaitu hadiah daripada komuniti Jepun.
Bendera Malaysia dibakar, diludah dalam demonstrasi di Jakarta
JAKARTA: Penunjuk perasaan di hadapan kedutaan Besar Malaysia di sini terus bersikap liar dengan membakar dan meludah Jalur Gemilang serta bergaduh dengan pasukan polis Indonesia yang mengawal di situ hari ini. (SOURCE:BERITA HARIAN 26/8/2010)
Ini merupakan satu penghinaan atau pengajaran kepada kita.Apakah yang patut kita lakukan sekirannya ia berlaku di negara ini.Adakah kita hanya membiarkan pihak tertentu yang mengambil tindakan atau kita sendiri akan membuat demonstrasi membantah cuba kita renungkan.Sampai bila perkara ini akan selesai adakah ia akan mengeruhkan hubungan diantara dua negara yang sudah lama menjalinkan persaudaraan.Adakah perkara ini berlaku kerana negara kita atau ia berlaku atas khabar angin yang datang dari negara indonesia yang menyebabkan penduduknya berasa marah terhadap negara kita.Adakah kita tidak menghormati negara sebarang tersebut?
